next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects --_000_SN1PR18MB0381F96D587C5C4B52AB3343B7680SN1PR18MB0381namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, Paul's idea is a good one. Unfortunately, my experience is that any si= gn restricting access to beaches by unleashed dogs and ATV's or even pointi= ng out that the beach is a Piping Plover nesting site is subject to removal= or vandalism by those that believe their need for unfettered access to the= beach supplants any law or restriction to their opinion. The only signs that I've heard about that seem to work (and I don't re= call exactly where I saw it) were homemade signs constructed by local young= people. Their advantage seemed to be that they weren't threatening and van= dals didn't seem to want to upset the parents of sign makers. All the best= . Fritz McEvoy Sunrise Valley, CB (near Dingwall) ________________________________ From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca <naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca> on beha= lf of Paul Murray <pwmurray.murray911@gmail.com> Sent: April 15, 2016 7:40 AM To: NatureNS Subject: [NatureNS] Conrad Beach - Dogs Off Leash Further to discussions about the off leash dog problem at Conrad Beach: I'll bet a lot of offenders have no clue about the consequences of their do= gs running off leash at Conrad (or other sensitive beaches for that matter)= and thus they need a clear warning such as a specific sign posted by DNR o= r other authority. I think if such a sign posted as a "WARNING" and the facts stated that this= is an environmentally protected beach and owners of dogs running off leash= are subject to being fined.[state the fine value] and then at the bottom l= ist the phone number to report offenders. Admittedly, we post speed limits on our roads and some will not follow them= regardless. But speed signs carry a specific penalty that everyone knows = about and they break the rules at their own peril. Without a specific war= ning sign at the sensitive beaches, a lot of people may not know they are b= reaking the rules and are subject to a fine. However, if informed "formall= y" by a sign posting, they will then have no excuse for letting there dogs= of leash. I believe it would be a great deterrent if the sign obviously r= equests the public to report offenders by providing the phone number on the= sign. Offenders knowing that anybody on the beach with a cell phone could= report them and that they would be subject to a fine should be enough to g= ain better compliance. Paul Murray Dartmouth --_000_SN1PR18MB0381F96D587C5C4B52AB3343B7680SN1PR18MB0381namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-= 1"> <style type=3D"text/css" style=3D"display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margi= n-bottom:0;} --></style> </head> <body dir=3D"ltr"> <div id=3D"divtagdefaultwrapper" style=3D"font-size:12pt;color:#000000;back= ground-color:#FFFFFF;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"> <p> Hi All, </p> <p> Paul's idea is a good one. Unfortunately, my ex= perience is that any sign restricting access to beaches by unleashed dogs&n= bsp;and ATV's or even pointing out that the beach is a Piping Plover n= esting site is subject to removal or vandalism by those that believe t= heir need for unfettered access to the beach supplants any law = or restriction to their opinion.</p> <p> The only signs that I've heard about that seem to wo= rk (and I don't recall exactly where I saw it) were homemade sign= s constructed by local young people. Their advantage seemed to be that they= weren't threatening and vandals didn't seem to want to upset the parents of sign makers. All the best.</p> <p> &n= bsp; Fritz McEvoy</p> <p> &n= bsp; Sunrise Valley, CB (near Din= gwall)</p> <br> <br> <div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> <hr tabindex=3D"-1" style=3D"display:inline-block; width:98%"> <div id=3D"divRplyFwdMsg" dir=3D"ltr"><font face=3D"Calibri, sans-serif" co= lor=3D"#000000" style=3D"font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> naturens-owner@chebuc= to.ns.ca <naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca> on behalf of Paul Murray <= ;pwmurray.murray911@gmail.com><br> <b>Sent:</b> April 15, 2016 7:40 AM<br> <b>To:</b> NatureNS<br> <b>Subject:</b> [NatureNS] Conrad Beach - Dogs Off Leash</font> <div> </div> </div> <div> <div dir=3D"ltr"> <div> <div> <div> <div>Further to discussions about the off leash dog problem at Conrad Beach= :<br> <br> </div> I'll bet a lot of offenders have no clue about the consequences of their do= gs running off leash at Conrad (or other sensitive beaches for that matter)= and thus they need a clear warning such as a specific sign posted by DNR o= r other authority. <br> <br> I think if such a sign posted as a "WARNING" and the facts stated= that this is an environmentally protected beach and owners of dogs running= off leash are subject to being fined.[state the fine value] and then at th= e bottom list the phone number to report offenders.<br> <br> </div> Admittedly, we post speed limits on our roads and some will not follow them= regardless. But speed signs carry a specific penalty that everyone k= nows about and they break the rules at their own peril. Without= a specific warning sign at the sensitive beaches, a lot of people may not know they are breaking the rules and are subject t= o a fine. However, if informed "formally" by a sign p= osting, they will then have no excuse for letting there dogs of leash. = ; I believe it would be a great deterren