next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0889_01D14C92.C2CAECB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All, Jan 11, 2016 Those who imagine that nature knows best will do well to not = advance that argument as a reason to back off from abusive harvesting of = biomass. That sort of attitude infuriates practical people and would = unfortunately generate resistance to change from current deplorable = practices.=20 I had hoped to sometime expand on my e-mail of Mar 1(dated Feb 28), = 2015, because I have many ideas with regard to possible practical ways = to back away from over-mechanized large-scale forestry and some of these = might work but it would be pointless to discuss these when "look but = don't touch" trumps all other considerations.=20 =20 If no way is found to effect a transition, so that more people can = earn a modest living from woodland, then most private woodland over time = will be bought up by big business and this is perhaps already under way. Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0889_01D14C92.C2CAECB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588"> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV>Dear All, =20 = =20 Jan 11, = 2016</DIV> <DIV> Those who imagine that nature knows best = will do=20 well to not advance that argument as a reason to back off from = abusive=20 harvesting of biomass. That sort of attitude infuriates practical people = and=20 would unfortunately generate resistance to change from current = deplorable=20 practices. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> I had hoped to sometime expand on my e-mail of = Mar=20 1(dated Feb 28), 2015, because I have many ideas with regard=20 to possible practical ways to back away from = over-mechanized=20 large-scale forestry and some of these might work but it would be = pointless=20 to discuss these when "look but don't touch" trumps all other=20 considerations. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> If no way is found to effect a transition, so = that more=20 people can earn a modest living from woodland, then most private = woodland over=20 time will be bought up by big business and this is perhaps already under = way.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0889_01D14C92.C2CAECB0--
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects