next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
ui_3_16_0_1_1450986872143_3124" dir=3D"ltr"><br></div>< Quoting David Patriquin <davidgpatriquin@yahoo.ca>: > Some of the rationale for these statements at > http://versicolor.ca/biomass/docs/PatriquinUARB24July2010.pdf "The NSP/New Page Biomass Project proposal lacks comprehensive quantitative life cycle modeling that is required to substantiate proponents’ claims that the project will reduce GHG emissions and that the resource can be sustainably harvested." > My efforts to get some response from NDP and Liberal Governments & > DNR on these issues have been totally futile. * this is so true of so many of these "renewable energy" projects! Being sustainable is supposed to mean you're taking into account the entire big picture, but so many of these seize on one aspect of the solution - wind, solar, tidal, hydroelectric, or biomass - and implement it in the same way conventional "resource extraction" has been done: as if fiscal exploitation of an opportunity made available by gov't, rather than solving the problem the programme is trying to address, was the only goal. We've coined the provincial motto "Green is Black" for the way these things have been done in Ontario. The way the Paris talks completely focused on emissions, rather than including sequestration, so annoyed the wife and me that we're thinking of doing one of our painting and documenting trips on the theme of the potential for carbon sequestration in mature communities and wetland soils, and Nova Scotia is included in the tentative trajectory, so next summer we may be knocking on the doors of some of you whom we've so far known only through NatureNS. (see http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.ca/2012/10/precious-wild-rivers-calendar-for-2013.html and the comments for an idea of how these trips work). fred. ------------------------------------------------------------ Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad Mudpuppy Night - http://pinicola.ca/mudpup1.htm Vulnerable Watersheds - http://vulnerablewaters.blogspot.ca/ study our books - http://pinicola.ca/books/index.htm RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0 on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/ "[The] two fundamental steps of scientific thought - the conjecture and refutation of Popper - have little place in the usual conception of intelligence. If something is to be dismissed as inadequate, it is surely not Darwin [, whose] works manifest the activity of a mind seeking for wisdom, a value which conventional philosophy has largely abandoned." Ghiselen, 1969. Triumph of the Darwinian Method, p 237. ------------------------------------------------------------
next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects