[NatureNS] Can naturalists predict storms before they occur?

Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:46:07 -0500
From: Fred Schueler <bckcdb@istar.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <001501d01c5e$93898070$ba9c8150$@ns.sympatico.ca>
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.7)
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Quoting John Kearney <john.kearney@ns.sympatico.ca>:

> As an social anthropologist, I find it exciting that western science is
> discovering what indigenous people have known for millennia; namely that
> certain types of animal behaviour can serve as an early warning system for
> the approach of storms or natural disasters.

>  However, on one island in the Indian Ocean where
> the indigenous culture had remained intact, the villagers did follow the
> lead of the animals and moved to higher ground thus avoiding any casualties.

* well, my Canadian brother-in-law in Kenya saw that the water level  
was falling, inferred that a tsunami was underway, and hustled folks  
to higher ground. Fortunately there wasn't a very high tsunami there -  
but we were stuck at the time with the idea that anybody from coastal  
BC, especially Haida Gwaii, would have reacted similarly.

fred.
------------------------------------------------------------
           Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
Daily Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
Vulnerable Watersheds - http://vulnerablewaters.blogspot.ca/
     study our books - http://pinicola.ca/books/index.htm
           RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
    on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
     (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/
"[The] two fundamental steps of scientific thought - the conjecture  
and refutation of Popper - have little place in the usual conception  
of intelligence. If something is to be dismissed as inadequate, it is  
surely not Darwin [, whose] works manifest the activity of a mind  
seeking for wisdom, a value which conventional philosophy has largely  
abandoned." Ghiselen, 1969. Triumph of the Darwinian Method, p 237.
------------------------------------------------------------


next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects