[NatureNS] earth not warming ?

From: darrell@abolitphotos.ca
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:19:55 +0000
References: <D7047295C4514317AEC995BAB5DCE597@D58WQPH1> <DM2PR0301MB09099938E6C98441930FA9CCB37A0@DM2PR0301MB0909.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <20141202095243.19646nbutvmu5c1n@webmail.ca.inter.net>
User-Agent: Webmail 6.0
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
      
   
  Volcano's are help keeping us cool with all the recent (10years or 
so) eruptions. 
   
   A part of the equation that cannot be ignored. 
   
   
   
  ===============================================
   

On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 09:52:43 -0500, Fred Schueler <bckcdb@istar.ca> wrote:
Quoting Stephen Shaw <srshaw@Dal.Ca>:
>
> > I think we've been here before a while back, and that this '17y > 
> not-warming' idea is just plain wrong. 
>
> * I think the basis of this is that, in documents written in 1999, 
> one can read that 1998 was the warmest year on record - and since 
> these documents haven't magically updated themselves, there must not 
> have been any warmer year since, despite the near-surface googlable 
> datum that that 2013 was the warmest. 
>
> It's characteristic of pseudoscience to base their arguments on 
> outdated statements and documents of the mainstream understanding of 
> a subject. A slight excuse for this, in this case, is that it was 
> around 1998 that the data were first on hand to calculate the overall 
> warmth of the planet. 
>
> fred. 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
> Daily Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
> Vulnerable Watersheds - http://vulnerablewaters.blogspot.ca/
> study our books - http://pinicola.ca/books/index.htm
> RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
> on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
> (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/
> "[The] two fundamental steps of scientific thought - the conjecture 
> and refutation of Popper - have little place in the usual conception 
> of intelligence. If something is to be dismissed as inadequate, it is 
> surely not Darwin [, whose] works manifest the activity of a mind 
> seeking for wisdom, a value which conventional philosophy has largely 
> abandoned." Ghiselen, 1969. Triumph of the Darwinian Method, p 237. 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

   


next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects