next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects If the bird(s) are the subjects of the sentence, the verb will tell the tale. Otherwise, ... damned if I know! -----Original Message----- From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] On Behalf Of Jim Wolford Sent: November-06-14 5:54 PM To: naturens Subject: [NatureNS] question re plurals of bird names?? (from nitpicker Jim) I have just read Ken McKenna's latest posting, as usual full of interesting stuff, but here is a question I have wanted to raise for some time now - and this will bug some of you, who should sign off now.. In recent times, I have grown tired of trying to know when to apply an "s" to make a plural vs. "knowing" which species are best left alone when forming plural numbers. Especially problematic are "snipe" vs. "snipes" or "woodcock" or "teal" etc. etc. I with my "common-sense" rules of grammar have decided to just Anglicize all bird names by adding "s" or "es" to all of them, as some of you have noted when I write "teals", e.g. What say the rest of you? or does anyone care? Is this important to anyone? Cheers from Jim in Wolfville.
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects