[NatureNS] Neolithic stone rings - encore.

Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:49:10 -0300
From: "George E. Forsyth" <g4syth@nspes.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <2E12CE5D5AF94026A6FDFF6F3E71D042@D58WQPH1>
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.2.1)
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

&gt;&gt;    You don't need to be a Greek Philoso
 Content preview:  Hi, I teach this same process in grade seven math! We use
   a primitive compass, a paper clip and two pencils. We also look at the use
    of this symbol in historic terms, a hex. The students all associate "hex"
    with a bad spell used by a witch or sorcerer, but soon find that it was used
    in northern European history as sign or symbol of good luck and fortune.
   The Pennsylvania "Dutch" use it as a protection on their barns, as a bearer
    of protection. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-1.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]

Hi,

I teach this same process in grade seven math! We use a primitive  
compass, a paper clip and two pencils. We also look at the use of this  
symbol in historic terms, a hex. The students all associate "hex" with  
a bad spell used by a witch or sorcerer, but soon find that it was  
used in northern European history as sign or symbol of good luck and  
fortune. The Pennsylvania "Dutch" use it as a protection on their  
barns, as a bearer of protection.

Interesting wondering how so many discoveries could have been made by  
"primitive" people without the computers and communication of our world.

Cheers, George Forsyth



Quoting David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>:

> Hi Steve & All,
>    We appear to be in essential agreement on this. Practical  
> geometric insights would likely all have come by accident in the  
> course of small scale and perhaps perishable decorative art  
> exercises; and once recognized and learned perhaps incorporated as a  
> part of practical culture long before any attempt theoretical  
> analysis. The latter requires leisure.
>
>    That same article provides a good example of this process on page  
> 33. where parallel evenly spaced straight lines engraved in stone  
> cross a sequence of other straight lines to produce a double row of,  
> what we would call isosceles triangles. And then secondary patterns  
> are inscribed within these triangles; some messy and some  
> attractive. The two long sides of one of these original triangles is  
> neatly bisected and the points joined to form a triangle of  
> identical shape but half as high. Then the base of the original  
> triangle is bisected and the points joined to form a total of four  
> identical triangles all within the original triangle that was twice  
> as high.
>     If that rather attractive pattern were to become widely used  
> then someone would eventually notice that when the height of a  
> figure like this is doubled the area will be four times as great.  
> And if this became understood then someone might notice that the  
> same applies to squares and rectangles. And those experienced in  
> dividing fields for various purposes would say "Well duh".
>    Decorative arts would also likely have revealed the circle  
> hexagon connection. If drawing careful circles using a forked stick  
> with one side sharpened and the other charred
> had come into common usage at some point then someone would  
> eventually have noticed that by placing the pointed arm anywhere on  
> a circle the charred end would pass through the center. And someone  
> would have noticed that this can be repeated 5 more times to yield  
> an attractive flower-like pattern with six-fold symmetry. Drop the  
> arcs that extend beyond the original circle, join the adjacent  
> points of the 6 petals and you have a hexagon just fitting a circle.
>    Perhaps more than one person on naturens will recall attempting  
> to draw this figure exactly, using an even more primitive compass,  
> as a pre-school rainy-day amusement.
>
> Yours truly, Dave Webster, Kentville
>
>
>  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Shaw" <srshaw@Dal.Ca>
> To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 3:48 PM
> Subject: RE: [NatureNS] Neolithic stone rings - encore.
>
>
>> Hi Eleanor,
>> Many years ago I recall reading that the neolithic denizens of  
>> Skara Brae used to cache the bones of their forebears in an  
>> ossuary, on stone ledges somewhere in their dwellings.  One of the  
>> memorable findings was that experts analyzed these bones as to time  
>> of death, revealing that practically nobody at Skara Brae had lived  
>> beyond the age of 30, apparently testifying to the hard life there.  
>>   I couldn't find any mention of this latterly, searching a couple  
>> of recent sources e.g. Wikipedia.  Did you come across any such  
>> information when you were there: is it still believed that they had  
>> nearly all died by an age that we would consider a very young?  I'm  
>> not sure that this is reflected in other early societies -- not the  
>> contemporary Egyptians, I think, who however were presumably much  
>> better fed.
>>
>> Hi Dave:  Maybe this flogging a dead horse, but I think you have it  
>> backwards.   In fact I suggested that the neolithic farmers could  
>> well have 'solved' what would later be called the "inscribed  
>> regular hexagon conjecture" by a simple practical-knowledge  
>> construction procedure of the sort that you advocate, without any  
>> foundation in theoretical geometry that would not arrive until much  
>> later, usually associated with the Greeks.   At the same time, it's  
>> not clear why stone circle-makers would have been sequentially  
>> pegging out the boundary of a large circle by trial and error to  
>> make any such discovery (if that's how they did it), if they didn't  
>> have some informal geometrical insight in the first place.  But I  
>> doubt that they could get that simply from looking at snowflakes,  
>> without a magnifying glass and ruler, though we did see plenty of  
>> snowflakes when we lived in Scotland.
>> Steve
>> ________________________________________
>> From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca]  
>> on behalf of Eleanor Lindsay [kelindsay135@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 11:45 AM
>> To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
>> Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Neolithic stone rings etd.
>>
>> On a completely different aspect of this topic, I spent time in Orkney
>> in the '70s during the early displays of the first discovery of ancient
>> dwellings which became exposed at Skara Brae after a major storm tore
>> masses of turf off the nearby shoreline, uncovering an entire
>> prehistoric village of stone houses with connecte