[NatureNS] Neonicatinoids & Fibronil

Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:36:12 -0400
From: Fred Schueler <bckcdb@istar.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <F769B0B890374B3D9B630113597A65CB@D58WQPH1> <CAD_MH0Mqgk+TeCYw814B31aDueHM=ggN0U45vJxk6Y0VtNamDA@mail.gmail.com> <39F2A0C8DB324262804633904B4236D4@D58WQPH1>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
On 6/26/2014 6:03 PM, David & Alison Webster wrote:

>     For insect biodiversity, and perhaps much else, this will likely
> trump the combined effects of all other environmental degradations.

* and just when the list was rejoicing in the recovery of Ospreys after 
the banning of DDT.

I imagine I could find a longterm decline in the big moths and Junebugs 
in our doing-the-streets data, though these are messed up by the way the 
municipality only replaces burned out streetlamps at a haphazard schedule.

fred.
=======================================================
>
> Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bev Wigney" <bkwigney@gmail.com>
> To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [NatureNS] Neonicatinoids & Fibronil
>
>
>> For further reading, I have linked to a paper stored as a .pdf on the
>> Ontario Beekeepers' Association website (see link below).
>>
>> Speaking for myself, I find much of the information in this document
>> to be very troubling. For one, the discussion of half-life in soil
>> certainly raises a red flag as far as I'm concerned.  See page 3.
>> "For the most commonly used seed treatments, reported half-lives in
>> soil typically range from 200 to in excess of 1000 days."  There is
>> more about the residue getting into groundwater and watersheds.
>>
>> I do wonder about all of this - not just with regard to bees, but
>> other insects as well.  This will be my fifth summer at my place
>> outside Annapolis Royal.  I have been putting out moth lights at night
>> each summer.  The first two summers here (2010 and 2011), I was quite
>> thrilled by the moths coming to the lamps.  Unfortunately, things have
>> gone downhill since then.  Last summer, I tried putting up different
>> lights and it made no great improvement.  Now I am at the point of
>> barely feeling it worthwhile to bother anymore.  I have puzzled over
>> what is going on - if there was some kind of forestry spraying taking
>> place that I was unaware of.  More recently, I've considered
>> neonicotinoids, but dismissed them as I did not think they would be in
>> use nearby.  However, upon more consideration, I realize that there
>> are very large corn fields at probably well less than 500 meters
>> distance as the bee flies.  After reading the linked document, I'm
>> thinking that is actually pretty close.
>>
>> Anyhow, here is the link to which I am referring:
>>
>> Journal of Applied Ecology 2013, 50, 977–987
>> Review
>> An overview of the environmental risks posedby neonicotinoid insecticides
>> Dave Goulson
>> Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling,
>> Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK
>>
>> http://www.ontariobee.com/sites/ontariobee.com/files/Goulson's_review_June_2013_J_appl_Ecol.pdf
>>
>>
>> On 6/26/14, David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com> wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>>     Questions about Neonicatinoids & Fibronil came up recently just
>>> before I
>>> became aware of recent reports.
>>>
>>> http://www.environmentalleader.com/2014/06/25/clear-evidence-neonicotinoids-a-key-factor-in-bee-decline/
>>>
>>>
>>>     When there is this much smoke there must be some fire. The
>>> practice of
>>> coating seeds with a systemic insecticide, that so I understand
>>> renders all
>>> tissue of that plant toxic to insects, is in itself sufficient to set
>>> off my
>>> alarm bells.
>>>
>>>     The above coupled with-
>>> http://qz.com/107970/scientists-discover-whats-killing-the-bees-and-its-worse-than-you-thought/
>>>
>>>
>>> show that use of pesticides should be governed by restraint.
>>>
>>>     As an aside, much of the pioneering research in Biological
>>> Control (AKA
>>> Integrated Pest Control) was carried out at Kentville largely with the
>>> objective, on principle, of using the least practicable quantity of
>>> pesticide.
>>>
>>> Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2014.0.4714 / Virus Database: 3972/7738 - Release Date: 06/24/14
>>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
          Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
Daily Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
Vulnerable Watersheds - http://vulnerablewaters.blogspot.ca/
    study our books - http://pinicola.ca/books/index.htm
          RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
   on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
    (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/
------------------------------------------------------------

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects