[NatureNS] Cornus suecica identification

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
References: <CAD2SNSAL8o827atqwgitVZDw9yNjPxZQFu76fJw9KYvcorq66A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 13:37:03 -0300
From: Caitlin Porter <caitlinjmporter@gmail.com>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
--e89a8f6439c8ef54ad04ea344aca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Burkhard,

This is definitely canadensis. The distinguishing difference is that the
veins in the leaves of suecica originate at the base of the leaf (not
connected to the midvein).

I have seen this kind of variation in canadensis on coastal barrens before
too (including at Duncans cove). It is very interesting and I've wondered
if there were also genetic differences within the species. Sometimes they
are even quite branched and spreading.

Katie


On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Burkhard Plache
<burkhardplache@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello fellow botanists,
>
> while walking the Duncan's Cove coastal trail,
> I came across a Cornus that did not look like
> the typical C. canadensis; the main difference
> is the shoot emerging from the four base leaves.
> Could this be C. suecica, which according to
> the Flora of Nova Scotia occurs in places along
> the coast?
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2w3h5j340nbxco3/vAWKKC4sbq
>
> Thanks for any insight,
> Burkhard
>

--e89a8f6439c8ef54ad04ea344aca
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Burkhard,=A0<div><br></div><div>This is definitely cana=
densis. The distinguishing difference is that the veins in the leaves of su=
ecica originate at the base of the leaf (not connected to the midvein).=A0<=
/div>
<div><br></div><div>I have seen this kind of variation in canadensis on coa=
stal barrens before too (including at Duncans cove). It is very interesting=
 and I&#39;ve wondered if there were also genetic differences within the sp=
ecies. Sometimes they are even quite branched and spreading.=A0</div>
<div><br></div><div>Katie=A0</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br>=
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Burkhard Plache=
 <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:burkhardplache@gmail.com" target=
=3D"_blank">burkhardplache@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello fellow botanists,<br>
<br>
while walking the Duncan&#39;s Cove coastal trail,<br>
I came across a Cornus that did not look like<br>
the typical C. canadensis; the main difference<br>
is the shoot emerging from the four base leaves.<br>
Could this be C. suecica, which according to<br>
the Flora of Nova Scotia occurs in places along<br>
the coast?<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2w3h5j340nbxco3/vAWKKC4sbq" target=3D=
"_blank">https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2w3h5j340nbxco3/vAWKKC4sbq</a><br>
<br>
Thanks for any insight,<br>
Burkhard<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--e89a8f6439c8ef54ad04ea344aca--

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects