next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0095_01CE7A58.E89C4830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tuma & All, July 6, 2013 Thanks for the explanation. My interest in this is to learn how much = bark damage a White Birch can tolerate. I had been told, as a kid, to = never remove all of the outer bark layers from any part of the trunk = because that would kill the tree. I had suspected that this was seldom = the case but have never bothered to put it to the test. Do you find that White Birch can usually tolerate removal of 2' of = outer bark from the entire circumference ? My hunch, from general = observation, is that the white outer bark is especially useful near and = just above maximum snow level to protect the cambium from sun-scald. I = have seen Red Maple regrowth with serious sun-scald damage to knee = height while Birch (sometimes brown at that age) had no scald. In like = vein, some of the steep S & SW facing screes in Cape Breton are (or were = 55 years ago) almost pure White Birch stands. In most second-growth woods, IMHO, loss of a tree tree here and = there is no big deal and in fact is usually positive. The suckers of = hardwoods are favorite deer salad and adjacent trees get a new lease on = life whenever any large tree is removed. Logging, even clearcut logging = is harmless relative to the relatively permanent damage caused by = construction of massive highway systems, parking lots and one-level = shopping centers. Parking lots could be much more environment and = lot-user friendly if they had porous pavement & 40 trees per acre. The = sometimes terrible damage to waterways caused by large clearcuts could = be almost entirely avoided if no more than 20% of a watershed could be = cut per decade. =20 Our misuse of natural resources can be accounted for if one assumes = that policy as well as advocacy by Environmentalists is based on advice = supplied by a Slime Mold brain; underfed and seldom watered. Either that = or a Committee Based System. Yt, Dave Webster, Kentville =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Tuma Young=20 To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca=20 Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2013 9:12 AM Subject: Re: [NatureNS] birch bark harvesting ad /"marker trees" The Mi'kmaq way of harvesting is to take the outer bark and only a = portion of the bark from the living tree. If the tree is dead on the = ground then all of the bark can be taken (usually for canoes). For = "craft" ( I use the term Art ) or medicinal purposes, you would only = take about a foot or two of bark. Never more and again it is of the = outer bark. The tree continues to live on but you can see where the = bark has been taken off.=20 Mr. Abolit: A culturally modified tree is one that has had parts of = it used by humans but remain alive but it shows how the humans have used = it. Trees cut vertically with a powersaw do not show how the tree were = used by humans. Perhaps it is a form of blazing that could have been = done by anyone. Based on your brief description, I would say that it = would not qualify as Mi'kmaq CMT's but was some sort of vandalism. I don't worry too much about birch bark harvesting and whether it can = kill the tree or not. The logging, electricity, construction, pulp & = paper industry are more efficient at killing trees. Now if you can = excuse me, I have to go check the local flyers if there are any sales of = 2X4's at the local lumber stores plus I need to pick up some Kleenex = tissues, paper towels and toilet paper for the house. Tuma=20 On 2013-07-05, at 11:28 PM, darrell@abolitphotos.ca wrote: Just past Whycocomagh there is a little park on the right, the white = birch there are all cut vertically with a powersaw. Culturally Modified Trees? ------------------------------------------------------------ On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:20:23 -0300 (ADT), Dusan Soudek = <soudekd@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote: Tuma, is there a tradition among the Mi'kmaq of "marker trees?" Or = a cultural memory of such trees? Such culturally modified trees had = their trunks partially broken, usually at two locations, with the result = that the trees remained alive but with a Z-shaped trunk. There are all = kinds of references to "marker trees" on the internet, but they are = almost all from the U.S....=20 Dusan Soudek On July 5, 2013 at 1:32 PM Tuma Young <tumayoung@me.com> wrote: The Mi'kmaq have been harvesting birch bark for thousands of = years for wide variety of uses and there is a method in which you use to = properly peel the bark without killing the tree. In fact, I will be = going out this weekend to harvest bark to make birchbark oil that is = used by traditional Mi'kmaq healers. Generally speaking the tree = suffers no damage and quickly heals. Trees that have been harvested = are called CMT's (Culturally Modified Trees) by researchers and this = also applies to longer growing species. CMT's have recently become the = subject of archaeological and anthropological research in BC. Locations = where CMT's are found have formed the basis for protection against = logging, clear cutting or biomass harvesting. On 2013-07-05, at 7:59 AM, nancy dowd < nancypdowd@gmail.com> = wrote: The following text of an ad on p.10 of Northern Woodlands = magazine (Summer '13) caught my attention:=20 "It's white birch bark harvest season! We need to buy bark = from thousands of trees in June and July!"=20 From the contact email I tracked down the company website:=20 http://www.birchbarkvt.com/=20 I though stripping birch bark from trees would kill the tree. = The website says nothing about the safety to the trees (or lack thereof) = of this activity.=20 Nancy =20 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.3345 / Virus Database: 3204/6467 - Release Date: = 07/05/13 ------=_NextPart_000_0095_01CE7A58.E89C4830 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type><BASE=20 href=3D"x-msg://17/"> <META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.23501"> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY=20 style=3D"WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; = -webkit-line-break: after-white-space"=20 bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Hi Tuma & All, = =20 = =20 July 6, 2013</FONT></D