next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects
Index of Subjects <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head> <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/> </head><body style=""> <div> Mary, </div> <div>    just curious about that suspiciously round  75 % figure. Is that true for all vegetation types? Here in N.S. the soil is incredibly thin. What is the source of the 75 % figure? With thanks, </div> <div> Dusan Soudek </div> <div>    </div> <div> <br/>---------- Original Message ---------- <br/>From: Mary Macaulay <marymacaulay@hotmail.com> <br/>To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca <br/>Date: April 11, 2013 at 7:56 AM </div> <div> <br/>Subject: [NatureNS] Forest Biomass burning environmental lunacy </div> <div> <br/>75% of the carbon stored on land is in the soil Dave. The richest deepest soils are under an old growth forest. A healthy forest canopy continues to feed that soil and protects it from erosion and oxidation. So .. the arguments against Industrial forestry are clear cut... <br/> <br/>Mary Macaulay, P.Eng. <br/>Executive Director <br/>Atlantic Concrete Association <br/>www.atlanticconcrete.ca <br/>Office: 902-443-4456 <br/>Cell: 902-489-2000 <br/>Fax: 902-404-8074 </div> </body></html>
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects