[NatureNS] spam type messages

Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:37:40 -0300
From: <fulton.harding@ns.sympatico.ca>
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Cc: Roland McCormick <roland.mccormick@ns.sympatico.ca>
Sensitivity: Normal
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

  use sympatico and as of late have found 
Normally Bell/Aliant sympatico has been fairly good on filtering out spam, not sure what is going on the last week or so.  Getting several spam emails every day.

Marian Fulton
Hantsport NS 

---- Roland McCormick <roland.mccormick@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote: 
> Hellow - I have the same problem and have been wondering if there were others who were getting the same kind of grabage.   Ten or twelve  is a little too much.
> 
> Roland.
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Sandy Hiltz 
>   To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca 
>   Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 10:55 AM
>   Subject: RE: [NatureNS] spam type messages
> 
> 
>   Same problem here Heather. I had about the same number this morning.
> 
>    
> 
>   Sandy
> 
>    
> 
>   From: naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca [mailto:naturens-owner@chebucto.ns.ca] On Behalf Of Heather Drope
>   Sent: June-27-12 10:29 AM
>   To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
>   Subject: [NatureNS] spam type messages
> 
>    
> 
>   I use sympatico and as of late have found that there is an awful lot of 'spam' geared more for a man then a woman- not that I want it geared for a woman. I just don't want it. I had twelve this am and that is twelve too many. Is anyone else having this problem?
> 
>   I have to ask this group as it is the only one that I am on and know that many of you use Sympatico. 
> 
>   Please let me know.
> 
>   Heather
> 
>   Heather Drope
> 
>   Nova Scotia Wild Flora Society
> 
>   www.nswildflora.ca
> 
>   902-440-5032
> 
>    
> 
>   We do not see nature with our eyes, 
> 
>   but with our understandings and our hearts. 
> 
>    W. Hazlett

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects