[NatureNS] "Common Moorhen"

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
References: <20111214162715.19105bhbrx27ci8s@wm2.dal.ca>
From: Tuma <tumayoung@yahoo.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:39:49 -0400
To: "naturens@chebucto.ns.ca" <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
Hi Ian et all. I have doc or record shots of the bird and will post tonight.

Tuma 

Sent from my iPhone

On 2011-12-14, at 4:27 PM, iamclar@DAL.CA wrote:

> Dear All:
> 
> I just had an excited phone call from a visiting birding friend who wondered if the current "Common Moorhen" was indeed that. I responded that it was very doubtful. IT'S O.K. YOU'VE ALL CORRECTLY ID'D IT, IM SURE!
> 
> But, the name of the species is now COMMON GALLINULE, as distinct from the COMMON MOORHEN of Eurasia.
> 
> It was long accepted that the N. American and Eurasian birds were the same species, but the North Am. birds retained their different name. I knew them once as Florida Gallinule, then as Common Gallinule (still the name in not-so-old field guides), but then they were re-named Common Moorhen to conform with Brit. usage.
> 
> Now they've been split on basis of behaviour, vocalizations, and genetics.
> 
> There is a remote possibility that could one fly or hitch hike here from Europe; there are almost a 100 for Iceland (species??), and there is a Eurasian Coot record for Labrador.
> 
> They're VERY similar; a salient difference is in the shape of the red shield - narrower and rounded at the top in Eurasian, broad and tapered from a flatish top end in the American.
> 
> Cheers, Ian
> 
> Ian McLaren
> 
> 
> 

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects