[NatureNS] e-bird

Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:36:54 +0000
From: Sydney Penner <sfp@sydneypenner.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100907 Fedora/3.1.3-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.3
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <AANLkTi=DozX07+Of8dOTM0QksoCtwHM8UHZsNJ3=9TZ=@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimDduLWsYkObF_p-B1x8TM+dDOnEXLXU9TNeeXz@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinqpkqeOJSCZ=k0L_rW1qEZNy-4ms9T2DO0bhiT@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

to get started!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;
I'll third the sentiment.

I'd also like to add that the data collected by eBird can be explored by 
the public. I've found this extraordinarily useful, especially when I'm 
visiting areas where I'm not familiar with what birds might be expected 
where. But on eBird's website it only takes me a few moments to pull up 
charts or maps that will show me exactly what species have been seen at 
what times of the year at what locations. This information, however, 
becomes a great deal more valuable with higher reporting rates. So, for 
example, if I pull up a bar chart for Cumberland County in Nova Scotia, 
there's enough information for me to get some sense of what species are 
likely to be seen at some point during the year. But there are lots of 
gaps, e.g., no records from the month of February. There would be little 
point in trying to narrow the location down even more or in restricting 
the year range -- there's just not enough data.

But when I was birding around Ithaca, NY, the situation was completely 
different. Enough lists were submitted there that if I pulled up the 
chart for some birding spot (e.g., Stewart Park, so at a much more 
fine-grained level even than counties), I would likely see half a dozen 
or more submitted lists for just the prior week. That sort of up-to-date 
data leaves me with a great sense for what I might see when I head down 
to Stewart Park myself. Of course, this is less useful for those of us 
birding on our home stomping grounds. We already know what to expect. 
But it's fantastic for someone travelling who is trying to get to grips 
with a bewildering number of new species.

The more lists we submit, the more useful eBird's data is for scientific 
purposes. But also the more useful it is for us amateur birdwatchers 
wanting to become better acquainted with the feathered diversity on our 
planet.

Best wishes,
Sydney

P.S. To get a quick sense for what kind of information you can pull up, 
here's a bar chart of what's been reported for Halifax County in the 
last ten years: 
http://ebird.org/ebird/GuideMe?src=changeDate&getLocations=counties&counties=CA-NS-HL&parentState=CA-NS&reportType=location&monthRadio=on&bMonth=01&eMonth=12&bYear=2001&eYear=2010&continue.x=70&continue.y=11&continue=Continue

And here's a map showing Boreal Chickadee sightings in NS for 2009-2010 
(yellow markers indicate sightings in the last 30 days): 
http://ebird.org/ebird/GuideMe?src=changeDate&speciesCodes=borchi2&getLocations=states&states=CA-NS&parentState=CA-NS&reportType=species&monthRadio=on&bMonth=01&eMonth=12&bYear=2009&eYear=2010&continue.x=59&continue.y=16&continue=Continue

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects