[NatureNS] The Halifax Hermit Warbler - expert views (long)

Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:16:20 -0400
From: iamclar@Dal.Ca
To: ns-rba@yahoogroups.com, naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3)
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


All:

I've received a some useful comments from three paramount experts on western
birds on our Halifax Hermit Warbler. Kimball Garrett is Ornithology Collections
Mamager at the Nat. Hist. Mus. of Los Angeles and a co-author of the fine
Peterson Field Guide on Warblers. Joeseph Morlan is an active field
oornithologist and teacher of field ornithology in California and has a very
useful website. Will Russell is a senior field ornithologist living mostly in
SW USA and is listowner/moderator of the Frontiers of Field Identification
website. As I expected, all believe it to be a pretty good Hermit Warbler,
although two especially stress that the situation is not simple.

Kimball Garrett writes:

"First, it must be acknowledged that there is sometimes a decoupling of
phenotype from genotype in the Townsend's/Hermit/B-t Green complex.
Birds that look phenotypically "pure" can indeed have some genetic
markers of another parental species, and I'm sure that some birds that
look phenotypically intermediate might actually be "pure" genetically.

The slight olive wash on the back of your bird is fine for Hermit in
fresh fall plumage.  That, in itself, is not necessarily suggestive of
intergradation (unless the olive is really brighter and more prominent
that it appears on my monitor).  The dinginess to the auriculars is not
at all troubling to me. I'm more troubled by the fine black streaking on
the flanks.

I'm more troubled by the fine black streaking on the flanks. At most, "pure"
Hermits should show just a few, very fine streaks on the sides, so your Halifax
bird might be a bit outside the curve there.  Whether this suggests
intergradation or just a broader range of phenotypes of Hermit than I am
familiar with, I don't know."

In short, I agree that your bird is not an obvious (e.g. F1) hybrid between
Townsend's and Hermit. It is quite possibly a "pure" Hermit, but the degree of
hybridization in these two taxa is so great that it is also easily possible
that the bird has hybrid ancestry."

Joe Morlan  writes:

"I showed the photos to Dan Singer last night and neither of us can come up
with any solid reason why the bird might be considered a hybrid.  Certainly
it would not raise any eyebrows if seen in California.  We are guessing
it's a young male, but I'm not all that clear on the extent of variation
between different age/sex classes.  I suppose it might be an adult female.

Anyway, lacking genetic data to the contrary, I would certainly endorse it
as a Hermit Warbler, not a hybrid.  It does not look like any of the hybrid
types we see in California.  The yellow chest is a dominant trait and all
the presumed hybrids I have seen had a yellow chest.  I have seen one
white-chested hybrid specimen, but it had a Townsend's Warbler face
pattern."

And Will Russell writes:

"I suspect Hermit x Townsends combinations, including backcrosses, are so
complicated that I would be hesitant to say anything on that score...but
there's nothing obvious in the images to suggest a hybrid (but see note
below about the dark crown streaking) given what I know.

I don't think this is an HY female.  My guess is HY male (I should wonder
about AHY female too...); the face is too yellow, the underparts too white,
the wingbars too bold, and the crown too dark.  Speaking of the dark
streakings on the crown, I'm not sure I've noticed them before in
Hermits...but that's probably because I haven't looked.  None of the guides
mention or illustrate them.  Are they apparent in life?"

So, I think everyone may feel comfortable about accepting the bird as a Hermit
Warbler on their life lists, even with Kimball Garrett's sensible caveats. My
own belief is that it's an HY (Hatching-Year) male, in the belief that the
Black throat should be less veiled and the auridulars darker in an AHY
(After-HY) female. But, it's also good to ponder the variability of nature and
recognize that things don't always fall neatly into our attempts at
categorization. That's why photgraphs and lots of picky written details are
often needed in documenting birds.

All best, Ian McLaren


next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects