next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C84C86.D21AF5D0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_001E_01C84C86.D21AF5D0"
------=_NextPart_001_001E_01C84C86.D21AF5D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
BlankI've been trying to see if I could find a hoary among "our" big flock
of common redpolls. I noticed that someone on this list said he looked for
a BIGGER bird. Well, our (old edition) Peterson says the hoary is SMALLER
than the common (4 1/2 -5 1/2 for the hornemanni and 5-5 1/2 for the
flammea)! Pat Mackay looked in her Sibley, and it also said the hoary was a
bit bigger than the common. Our Burrows book also says the hoary is bigger.
Wow. Did Roger Tory Peterson actually make a mistake?? The illustration in
our Burrows shows the side of the hoary's head (lores and auricular) to be
very light. What have you experts found?
Happy new year everyone, and thanks again for all the help we've gotten from
so many of you in 07. It has been a joy for us to learn something about the
birds this past year.
Jane Schlosberg
Tulip street, Dartmouth
------=_NextPart_001_001E_01C84C86.D21AF5D0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE id=3DridTitle>Blank</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<STYLE>BODY {
MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; =
FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; =
FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
LI.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; =
FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
</STYLE>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3DridBody background=3Dcid:625544418@01012008-2089>
<P><SPAN class=3D625544418-01012008>I've been trying to see if I could =
find a=20
hoary among "our" big flock of common redpolls. I =
noticed that=20
someone on this list said he looked for a BIGGER bird. Well, our =
(old=20
edition) Peterson says the hoary is SMALLER than the common (4 1/2 =
-5 1/2=20
for the hornemanni and 5-5 1/2 for the flammea)! Pat Mackay looked =
in her=20
Sibley, and it also said the hoary was a bit bigger than the =
common. Our=20
Burrows book also says the hoary is bigger. Wow. Did Roger =
Tory=20
Peterson actually make a mistake?? The illustration in our Burrows =
shows=20
the side of the hoary's head (lores and auricular) to be very =
light. What=20
have you experts found?</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=3D625544418-01012008>Happy new year everyone, and thanks =
again for=20
all the help we've gotten from so many of you in 07. It has been a =
joy for=20
us to learn something about the birds this past year.</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=3D625544418-01012008>Jane Schlosberg</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=3D625544418-01012008>Tulip street,=20
Dartmouth</SPAN></P></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_001_001E_01C84C86.D21AF5D0--
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C84C86.D21AF5D0
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name="Blank Bkgrd.gif"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: <625544418@01012008-2089>
R0lGODlhLQAtAID/AP////f39ywAAAAALQAtAEACcAxup8vtvxKQsFon6d02898pGkgiYoCm6sq2
7iqWcmzOsmeXeA7uPJd5CYdD2g9oPF58ygqz+XhCG9JpJGmlYrPXGlfr/Yo/VW45e7amp2tou/lW
xo/zX513z+Vt+1n/tiX2pxP4NUhy2FM4xtjIUQAAOw==
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C84C86.D21AF5D0--
next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects