[NatureNS] PS Earthworm effects

Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:44:18 -0400
From: David & Alison Webster <dwebster@glinx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 (CPQCA3C01)
To: NatureNS@chebucto.ns.ca
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


Dear All,                Dec 2, 2007
    After having made some comments about Suarez et al. today, so I 
could lose track of where the hard copy was and where it came from, I 
was inspired to see what my 1946 Forest Soils text (Lutz & Chandler) had 
to say on the subject of earthworms.

    On pages 107-108; "...in temperate zone forests disintegration of 
the litter which fall to the ground each year is most prompt and 
incorporation of material into the mineral  soil is most complete where 
earthworms or large millipedes are present in considerable numbers." and 
"...the formation of coarse mull is directly associated with an abundant 
and active earthworm or large arthropod population."

    So apparently this aspect of earthworm effects in forest soils has 
been accepted as a given for more than 60 years.

    What appears to have changed is the perception of consequences; spin.

     In 1946, mull soils and the associated rapid incorporation of 
recent litter into the soil profile by earthworm or large arthropod 
activity were regarded as being highly desirable [as opposed to the 
relatively poor, shallow, drouth-prone, species-poor, earthworm-free, 
mor soils].

    For reasons that I fail to understand, this previous 'good thing' is 
now a 'bad thing'. Perhaps it is just an expression of the 20-year 
academic pendulum cycle. If so, then any year now the discovery will be 
made that earthworm activity is a 'good thing' in forest soils.

    Overall forest health will probably not be affected by this swing in 
spin.

Yours truly, Dave Webster

   

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects