[NatureNS] Cecropia Moth - Jeannie S

From: "Elizabeth Doull" <edoull@ns.sympatico.ca>
To: <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
References: <000601c77a1c$d4fcf8d0$7a91de18@yourat5qgaac3z> <8bd3bed60707161451y3e9ba631s35fc13563f07508a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:24:32 -0300
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00D6_01C7C7E7.51AF1530
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 Hi everyone,

 Here are a couple of photos.The first one is a photo of a moth that my=20
 niece  took and I pasted a picture of the cecropia moth that I had on =
the photo.Now=20
 to  me they look completely different.What I was wondering, is, are =
they both
 cecropia moths and one is just a bit worn? Or are they completely=20
 different  species? The second is a photo of the cecropia that I had,(a =
close-up)

 http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2710463760025930195pIdCmK

 http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2917419830025930195IxTeCq
 Jeannie Shermerhorn,Port Hawkesbury

 Cottage....Cape George,Cape Breton
------=_NextPart_000_00D6_01C7C7E7.51AF1530
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16481" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>&nbsp;Hi everyone,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial><BR>&nbsp;Here are a couple of photos.The first =
one is a=20
photo of a moth that my <BR>&nbsp;niece&nbsp;&nbsp;took and I pasted a =
picture=20
of the cecropia moth that I had on the photo.Now =
<BR>&nbsp;to&nbsp;&nbsp;me they=20
look completely different.What I was wondering, is, are they=20
both<BR>&nbsp;cecropia moths and one is just a bit worn? Or are they =
completely=20
<BR>&nbsp;different&nbsp;&nbsp;species? The second is a photo of the =
cecropia=20
that I had,(a close-up)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>&nbsp;<A=20
href=3D"http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2710463760025930195pIdCmK">htt=
p://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2710463760025930195pIdCmK</A></FONT></DIV=
>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>&nbsp;<A=20
href=3D"http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2917419830025930195IxTeCq">htt=
p://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2917419830025930195IxTeCq</A><BR>&nbsp;Je=
annie=20
Shermerhorn,Port Hawkesbury</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>&nbsp;Cottage....Cape George,Cape=20
Breton</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00D6_01C7C7E7.51AF1530--

next message in archive
next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects