FW: [NatureNS] Pink sands

Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 01:15:29 -0300
From: Jim Wolford <jimwolford@eastlink.ca>
To: NatureNS <naturens@chebucto.ns.ca>
User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects


This isn't relevant for the pink sands, I think, but I believe Ian meant
purple sulphur bacteria, not cyanobacteria (which we used to call blue-green
algae, now considered bacteria since they are free of organelles), in salt
marshes.  Jim in Wolfville
----------
From: iamclar@dal.ca
Reply-To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 13:29:42 -0300
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca, Sherman Williams <sherm@glinx.com>
Subject: [NatureNS] Pink sands

Hi again, Sherman.

I removed magenta from the pics, and the background tones became more
natural on
my screen, but the pink (more pale mauve, I'd say) remains on the outer
beach. 
I think this might result from a sorting of heavy mineral sands (Zircon).
But
perhaps others are right about an organic origin. It is unlikely that beach
sands would be anoxic enough and laden with sulphides to harbour "purple
Cyanobacteria" (I don't know current taxonomic assigment), which produce
this
sort of colour on saltmarsh muds.

Cheers, Ian McLaren

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
Index of Subjects