[NatureNS] Re: Tides Halifax Harbour

Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:40:12 -0300
From: Dusan Soudek <soudekd@ns.sympatico.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
To: naturens@chebucto.ns.ca
References: <20060802134906.69974.qmail@web36203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <naturens-mml-owner@chebucto.ns.ca>
Original-Recipient: rfc822;"| (cd /csuite/info/Environment/FNSN/MList; /csuite/lib/arch2html)"

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects

Index of Subjects
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020203070608030305030000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi all,
    yes, there can be a huge difference between predicted and actual 
tides, particularly in tidal rivers and in shallow seas. For example, 
the Shubie is tidal for some 45-49 km from its mouth. The timing of the 
so-called tidal bore and the dead high tide depends not only on the size 
of the tide (neap vs. spring), but on winds, atmospheric pressure, and 
the amount of flow in the river.
    This is also true for the St. John River in N.B., where the tides 
around Fredericton and in Grand Lake (and elsewhere) are discernible 
only during very low-flow times of the year.
    Dusan Soudek

Paul MacDonald wrote:

>Hi Blake and All
>High tides or low ones for that matter have
>variability based on winds, air pressure and so on so
>if you were to measure exactly when the highest water
>was or the lowest - these time measurements would have
>some noise.
>Often when out in tidal water you will note the tidal
>start to fall and then reverse itself and come up some
>more.
>The thing is not to get to tied up on exact times.
>Have a nice summer
>Paul
>
>  
>

--------------020203070608030305030000
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi all,<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; yes, there can be a huge difference between <i>predicted </i>and <i>actual</i>
tides, particularly in tidal rivers and in shallow seas. For example,
the Shubie is tidal for some 45-49 km from its mouth. The timing of the
so-called tidal bore and the dead high tide depends not only on the
size of the tide (neap vs. spring), but on winds, atmospheric pressure,
and the amount of flow in the river. <br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This is also true for the St. John River in N.B., where the tides
around Fredericton and in Grand Lake (and elsewhere) are discernible
only during very low-flow times of the year.<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Dusan Soudek<br>
<br>
Paul MacDonald wrote:<br>
<blockquote
 cite="mid20060802134906.69974.qmail@web36203.mail.mud.yahoo.com"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">Hi Blake and All
High tides or low ones for that matter have
variability based on winds, air pressure and so on so
if you were to measure exactly when the highest water
was or the lowest - these time measurements would have
some noise.
Often when out in tidal water you will note the tidal
start to fall and then reverse itself and come up some
more.
The thing is not to get to tied up on exact times.
Have a nice summer
Paul

  </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------020203070608030305030000--

next message in archive
no next message in thread
previous message in archive
previous message in thread
Index of Subjects